Misuse of Corporate Assets: Comprehensive Overview for Switzerland 2025

The data in this article was verified on November 25, 2025

Written and verified by Félix. Learn more about me →

This article presents a detailed overview of Switzerland’s legal approach to the misuse of corporate assets, highlighting relevant statutes and enforcement tendencies as they apply in 2025. Readers interested in the specifics of corporate governance and potential legal consequences in Switzerland will find all essential regulatory data clearly summarized below.

Legal Framework for Misuse of Corporate Assets in Switzerland

Switzerland does not have a criminal offense specifically labeled “misuse of corporate assets” (délit d’abus de biens sociaux). This contrasts with certain jurisdictions where such conduct is categorically prosecuted. Instead, Swiss law regulates related conduct under broader criminal and civil statutes, and criminal liability only arises under defined, more stringent circumstances. This distinction has significant implications for directors, shareholders, and company officers operating or considering operations within Switzerland.

Key Legal References in 2025

Relevant Legislation Applicable Provisions
Swiss Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB) Art. 146 (Fraud), Art. 158 (Breach of Trust)
Swiss Code of Obligations General corporate governance duties and directors’ obligations

For official references and more information, consult the Swiss Criminal Code and the Swiss Code of Obligations on the Swiss government website.

Criminal Liability: Policy Overview

Under Swiss law in 2025, the simple act of using corporate assets for private benefit is not automatically a criminal offense. Criminal liability requires aggravating elements—such as intent to defraud, serious violation of trust, or financial harm to third parties. The relevant statutes are as follows:

  • Fraud (Art. 146 StGB): Only applies if there is active deception and resulting financial loss to others.
  • Breach of Trust (Art. 158 StGB): Requires abuse of a position of trust for a personal advantage, causing harm to another party (often the company or its creditors).

Where the sole shareholder and director mix personal and company funds, but there is no harm to third parties, Swiss authorities typically refrain from criminal prosecution. However, this behavior may still result in civil or administrative actions, especially in the context of bankruptcy or disputes among shareholders or with creditors.

Civil and Administrative Consequences

While criminal prosecution for misuse of corporate assets is highly exceptional under Swiss law, civil and administrative liabilities remain a risk. Notably:

  • Directors’ liability: Company directors can be held liable in civil court for breach of fiduciary duties under the Swiss Code of Obligations, especially when misuse leads to financial loss for the company or third parties.
  • Corporate veil piercing: In cases of asset commingling or improper corporate conduct, courts may “pierce the corporate veil” and impose personal liability on shareholders or directors.

Summary Table: Swiss Legal Approach to Misuse of Corporate Assets (2025)

Issue Criminal Liability Main Legal Reference Civil/Administrative Action
General misuse (no third-party harm) No Swiss Criminal Code not applicable Possible, under Swiss Code of Obligations
With fraud or breach of trust Yes, if elements present Art. 146, 158 StGB Likely, in addition to criminal liability

Relevant Court Decision

The interpretation of these principles has been upheld by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (see 6S.382/2002), reinforcing the need for clear evidence of harm to third parties or fraudulent intent before criminal proceedings are initiated. Corporate actions that do not harm third parties are generally not criminalized but may still lead to other legal consequences.

Pro Tips for Managing Corporate Assets in Switzerland

  • Maintain clear separation between personal and corporate funds to avoid civil disputes or loss of limited liability protection.
  • Document all decisions and asset transfers thoroughly, particularly in single-shareholder companies.
  • If in doubt about corporate asset use, seek guidance on compliance with Swiss Code of Obligations and maintain formal board resolutions for major transactions.
  • Be aware that, while criminal charges for asset misuse are rare, improper handling can still attract administrative and reputational risks.
  • Monitor any changes in Swiss regulatory practice, as oversight intensity can evolve.

For official information, you may consult the Swiss government’s main website at admin.ch.

In summary, Switzerland’s legal environment in 2025 does not criminalize the simple misuse of corporate assets unless accompanied by fraud or demonstrable harm to third parties. Nevertheless, company officers and shareholders should maintain best practices in governance and record-keeping to avert civil or administrative challenges. Carefully separating personal and business transactions remains essential, as improper practices, while not typically criminal, can still have significant legal and financial repercussions in Switzerland.

Related Posts