Misuse of Corporate Assets: Comprehensive Overview for Mayotte 2025

The data in this article was verified on November 23, 2025

Written and verified by Félix. Learn more about me →

The legal framework surrounding the misuse of corporate assets in Mayotte for 2025 is defined by precise statutory provisions. This article examines these policies, focusing specifically on how the local adaptation of French commercial law regulates improper use of company property by company officers, including sole directors and shareholders.

Legal Definition and Scope of Misuse of Corporate Assets

In Mayotte, the misuse of corporate assets—referred to in legal terms as “abus de biens sociaux”—is addressed by a direct application of Article 241-3, 4° of the Code de commerce. This provision is extended to Mayotte via Article 931-1 of the Code de commerce. The law targets actions where company assets are used contrary to the company’s interests, whether for personal advantage or to benefit others, and applies regardless of whether or not third-party harm is established. This covers not only directors and executives but also sole directors and sole shareholders.

Criminal Liability Framework in Mayotte

For 2025, the criminal liability for misuse of company assets in Mayotte is active and enforceable. Both companies and individuals alike are subject to prosecution under this regime. The relevant legal references from the commercial code guarantee no ambiguity in enforcement, particularly skewed to prevent abuse by those with sole control of a company—removing common loopholes often available in other jurisdictions.

Criminal Liability Law Reference (2025) Applicability to Sole Directors/Shareholders
Yes Article 241-3, 4° of the Code de commerce
(via Article 931-1 for Mayotte)
Applies, regardless of prejudice

Key Components of the Legal Provision

  • Legal Source: Article 241-3, 4° of the Code de commerce, extended by Article 931-1 for Mayotte.
  • Offense Targeted: Misuse of company assets (abus de biens sociaux).
  • Liability: Criminal; officers can face prosecution even if they are the sole director and sole shareholder.
  • Scope: Broad application with no need to prove harm to third parties for liability to arise.

Interpreting the Regulatory Focus

This robust framework reflects the authorities’ intent to enforce strict corporate governance in Mayotte. Responsibility extends to all persons in controlling positions, emphasizing that corporate assets must serve the company’s best interests and not be diverted for unauthorized or personal use. Unlike many jurisdictions, the absence of third-party damage is no defense, reinforcing a preventative and punitive approach to internal asset mismanagement.

Reference to Official Source

For additional verification or updates to the law, consult the official commercial code or government legal portals for Mayotte, available via the main French government website at gouvernement.fr.

Pro Tips for Ensuring Compliance

  • Document All Asset Movements: Maintain clear, detailed records for every company asset transaction to support the business rationale and facilitate internal or external review.
  • Separate Personal and Company Assets: Never intermingle personal expenses or benefits with company assets, even if you are the sole shareholder or director.
  • Periodic Compliance Checks: Schedule regular legal audits or reviews to ensure all handling of company assets aligns with statutory requirements.
  • Educate Management: Make sure all executives and officers are aware of the criminal liability framework to minimize unintentional breaches.

In summary, Mayotte applies a strict, clearly defined legal regime for the misuse of corporate assets, with criminal liability extending to even sole directors and shareholders. For anyone operating a business in Mayotte in 2025, understanding and adhering to these rules is crucial—not only to avoid sanctions, but to ensure the integrity and reputation of your company are preserved in a well-regulated market environment.