Unlock freedom without terms & conditions.

Misuse of Corporate Assets in Latvia: What You Must Know (2026)

Active monitoring. We track data about this topic daily.

Last manual review: February 06, 2026 · Learn more →

Latvia. Small, Baltic, efficient in some ways, opaque in others. If you’re running a company here—especially as a sole director and shareholder—you might wonder: can I actually get in trouble for “misusing” corporate assets? The short answer is more nuanced than most lawyers will admit upfront.

Let me cut through the noise.

The Criminal Law Backdrop: Section 196 and the “Harm” Threshold

Latvian Criminal Law Section 196 (Krimināllikums 196. pants) deals with Abuse of Authority. Section 179 covers Embezzlement. Both sound scary. Both can theoretically apply to corporate officers who play fast and loose with company funds.

But here’s the twist: these statutes hinge on the concept of substantial harm (būtisks kaitējums). What does that mean?

It means damage to the company, its creditors, employees, or the state’s tax interests. If your company is solvent, has no creditors breathing down its neck, no employees you’re screwing over, and you’re the only shareholder, then the threshold for criminal liability is essentially not met. Your consent as the owner negates the criminal element. You can’t steal from yourself in the eyes of Latvian criminal law—at least not in this configuration.

That’s the pragmatic reality. Criminal prosecution for misuse of corporate assets in Latvia requires a victim. No victim, no crime.

So I Can Do Whatever I Want?

Hold on. I didn’t say that.

Just because you won’t end up in a courtroom facing criminal charges doesn’t mean you’re operating in a consequence-free zone. The Latvian Commercial Law (Komerclikums), specifically Section 139, imposes a duty on directors to act as a “diligent and prudent manager.” That’s a civil standard. Breach it, and you could face civil liability—lawsuits from minority shareholders (if any emerge), creditors if the company later becomes insolvent, or regulatory scrutiny.

More importantly: the tax authorities don’t care about your internal corporate theatre. If you’re pulling cash out of the company without proper documentation, calling it a “loan” that never gets repaid, or charging personal expenses to the business, the State Revenue Service (Valsts ieņēmumu dienests) will treat it as hidden profit distribution. That means you owe personal income tax. And possibly penalties. And interest.

Tax evasion is a separate criminal offense under Latvian law, governed by different sections of the Criminal Law. The “no harm, no foul” logic doesn’t apply there.

What Counts as “Misuse” in Practice?

Let’s get concrete. Here are scenarios I see constantly:

Using Company Funds for Personal Expenses

Paying for your vacation with the company card. Buying a car “for business” that you drive exclusively on weekends. Renting an apartment in Riga’s Old Town at inflated rates and claiming it’s an office.

Criminally? Probably fine if you’re the sole shareholder and the company is healthy. Civilly and fiscally? You’re playing with fire. The tax office will reclassify these as dividends or in-kind benefits, and you’ll owe tax at personal rates—up to 20% on dividends plus solidarity tax (another 3% on income above a threshold, which in 2026 remains at approximately €78,100 annually, or roughly $84,350).

Loans to Yourself

You “borrow” €50,000 ($54,000) from your SIA. No written agreement. No repayment schedule. No interest.

The tax authorities will likely deem this a disguised dividend. You’ll owe the tax. The company may also face issues with deductibility if it later writes off the loan as a bad debt—because you can’t reasonably claim a loss on a loan to yourself that was never arm’s length.

Inflated Management Fees or Salaries

Paying yourself an exorbitant salary or management fee that far exceeds market rates. If the company can afford it and you’re declaring the income properly, this is mostly a tax optimization question. But if you’re simultaneously claiming the company is unprofitable to avoid corporate income tax (which in Latvia is 20% on distributed profits under the cash-flow model introduced in 2018), you’re inviting an audit.

The Tax Angle: Latvia’s Unique Corporate Tax System

Latvia has a distinctive corporate tax regime. Since 2018, corporate income tax is applied only upon profit distribution, not on retained earnings. The rate is 20% on distributed profits (or 25% for certain payments, like dividends to individuals or non-residents without proper documentation).

This system incentivizes keeping profits in the company. But it also means that any extraction of value—dividends, excessive salaries, disguised benefits—triggers taxation. The State Revenue Service watches closely.

If they determine you’ve been misusing corporate assets to avoid paying personal income tax, they’ll reclassify the transactions. You’ll get hit with back taxes, penalties (typically 10% to 50% of the unpaid amount), and interest.

The “Diligent and Prudent Manager” Standard

Back to the Commercial Law. Section 139 requires directors to act with the care of a diligent and prudent manager. This is a flexible, case-by-case standard. Courts look at whether your actions served a legitimate business purpose.

If you can document a rationale—even a thin one—you’re generally safe from civil liability. But if you’re blatantly siphoning assets with no business justification, and the company later faces creditors or minority shareholders, you could be personally liable for losses.

Key point: this is a civil matter, not criminal. The remedy is damages, not jail time. But it can still be expensive and reputation-damaging.

Practical Steps to Stay Safe

First: document everything. If you’re taking money out, formalize it. Dividend resolution? File it. Loan agreement? Draft it, even if you’re lending to yourself. Management fee? Invoice it properly.

Second: pay the tax. I know, I know—nobody likes handing cash to the state. But the cost of non-compliance in Latvia (penalties, interest, legal headaches) usually exceeds the tax you’re trying to avoid. Latvia’s corporate tax system is already relatively favorable if you structure things correctly.

Third: keep the company solvent. The entire “no criminal liability” logic collapses if creditors or employees get hurt. If the company goes insolvent and it turns out you drained assets beforehand, prosecutors can and will pursue you under embezzlement or fraud statutes. The harm threshold gets met, and you’re in criminal territory.

Fourth: separate personal and corporate finances cleanly. Use separate bank accounts. Don’t co-mingle. It’s basic hygiene, but you’d be shocked how many entrepreneurs ignore it.

What If You’re Not the Sole Shareholder?

Everything changes. If there are minority shareholders, your actions as director are scrutinized much more closely. Taking company funds for personal use without proper authorization could expose you to civil suits for breach of fiduciary duty. The “harm” element for criminal liability is easier to establish because now there are other owners whose interests you’re potentially prejudicing.

Even if you own 51%, the other 49% can sue. Latvia’s courts do entertain shareholder derivative actions, and they’re not always sympathetic to controlling shareholders who treat the company as a personal piggy bank.

The Role of the State Revenue Service

I mentioned them earlier, but let me underscore: the Valsts ieņēmumu dienests is the real watchdog here, not the criminal police. They conduct audits, reclassify transactions, and assess penalties. They also share information with other agencies, including law enforcement, if they suspect serious fraud.

Their focus is revenue collection, not moral policing. But if you’re flagrant enough, they’ll escalate. And once criminal investigators get involved, the game changes entirely.

When Does It Become Criminal After All?

Let’s be clear: criminal prosecution for misuse of corporate assets in Latvia is rare in the classic sole-shareholder, solvent-company scenario. But it’s not impossible.

If you’re systematically evading taxes, creating fake expenses, or using the company as a vehicle for money laundering or fraud against third parties, you’ve crossed into criminal territory. The “no harm” defense evaporates.

Similarly, if you drain the company’s assets knowing it’s about to face creditors or tax liabilities, that’s embezzlement or fraudulent conveyance. Prosecutors will charge you, and judges will convict.

Final Thoughts

Latvia occupies a middle ground. It’s not a draconian nanny state that criminalizes every corporate misstep. But it’s also not a lawless free-for-all. The legal framework is pragmatic: as long as you’re the sole owner, the company is solvent, and you’re paying your taxes, the state largely leaves you alone.

Step outside those boundaries, though, and you’ll find the system has teeth. The key is knowing where the lines are—and not assuming that because something isn’t criminal, it’s consequence-free.

If you’re serious about operating in Latvia, treat your corporate structure with respect. Use it as a tool for fiscal optimization, not a shield for recklessness. The state might not throw you in jail for borrowing from your own company, but it will extract its pound of flesh through taxes and penalties if you play games.

Stay smart. Stay documented. And remember: the best defense against accusations of misuse is a paper trail that shows you knew exactly what you were doing—and did it within the rules.

Related Posts